Rhonda Tucker
Memphis (MEM) · Memphis, TN
Rhonda Tucker is listed with Memphis (MEM). The database records 9 asylum outcomes: 0 approved, 9 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Rhonda M. Tucker was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2026. Judge Tucker earned a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice in 1998 from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from the University of Arkansas School of Law. From January 2005 to April 2026, she served as a deputy prosecuting attorney for the 11W Judicial District of Arkansas. From December 2001 to December 2004, she was an associate attorney at the Dickerson Law Firm in El Dorado and Pine Bluff, Arkansas. Judge Tucker is a member of the Arkansas Bar.
Education: Judge Tucker earned a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice in 1998 from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from the University of Arkansas School of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Tucker is a member of the Arkansas Bar.
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
