Loading EOIR judge data…
TRRB · EOIR JUDGE PROFILE
Kyle V. Mitchell
Miami (MIA) · Miami, FL
Kyle V. Mitchell is listed with Miami (MIA). The database records 103 asylum outcomes: 1 approved, 102 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly changes
Yearly asylum decision trend
Applicant origin
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Official appointment record
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Kyle V. Mitchell was a ppointed as an immigration judge in June 2026. Judge Mitc hell was previously appointed as a temporary immigration judge and began hearing cases in November 2 025. F rom 2021 to 2025, he served in various attorney positions with the Federal government. F rom 2015 to 20 21, he served in leadership positions at a prominent Texas non-p rofit. From 2006 to 2015, he served in the executive branch of state government for the State of Texas. From 2000 to 2006, he served as an attorney in state government f or the State of Florida and a distinguished law firm. Since 2003, Judge Mitchell has served as a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army Reserve, t he Texas National Guard, and the U.S. Army.
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.