Jonathan Charles. Andresen
Houston (HSG) · Houston, TX
Jonathan Charles. Andresen is listed with Houston (HSG). The database records 41 asylum outcomes: 0 approved, 41 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Jonathan Charles Andresen was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in October 2025. Judge Andresen earned a Bachelor of Science in 2000 from Texas A&M University and a Juris Doctorate in 2004 from South Texas College of Law. From 2020 to 2025, he served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Houston. From 2004 to 2020, he was in private practice in Houston. Judge Andresen is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
Education: Judge Andresen earned a Bachelor of Science in 2000 from Texas A&M University and a Juris Doctorate in 2004 from South Texas College of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Andresen is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
EOIR Announces 11 Immigration Judges and 25 Temporary Immigration Judges (2025-10-24) →
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
