Daniel J. Wright
Atlanta (ATL) · Atlanta, GA
Daniel J. Wright is listed with Atlanta (ATL). The database records 22 asylum outcomes: 0 approved, 22 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Daniel J. Wright was appointed as an immigration judge to begin he aring cases in May 202 6. Judge Wright earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2010 f rom the University of Georgia and a Ju ris Doctor in 2014 from the University of Georgia School of Law. From October 201 8 to April 2026, he served as a counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OP LA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enfor cement (ICE), Department of Homeland Secu rity (DHS), in At lanta. From July 2016 to October 2018, he s erved as an assi stant chief counse l with OPLA, IC E, DHS, in Harlingen, Texas. From December 2014 to June 2016, he w as an associate attorney at Pot ra Law Firm in Suwanee, Georgia. Jud ge Wright is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.
Education: Judge Wright earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2010 f rom the University of Georgia and a Ju ris Doctor in 2014 from the University of Georgia School of Law.
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
