Chloe S. Dillon
San Francisco (SFR) · San Francisco, CA
Chloe S. Dillon is listed with San Francisco (SFR). The database records 668 asylum outcomes: 638 approved, 30 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Chloe S. Dillon was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Dillon earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Dartmouth College, a Master of Arts in 2003 from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2010from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. From 2012 to 2022, Judge Dillon was a trial attorney at Federal Defenders of San Di ego Inc. From 2010 to 2012, s he served as an attorney advisor at the Los Angeles Immigration Court. Judge Dillon is a member of the State Bar of California.
Education: Judge Dillon earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Dartmouth College, a Master of Arts in 2003 from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2010from the University of Arizona James E.
Bar admission: Judge Dillon is a member of the State Bar of California.
EOIR Announces 32 New Immigration Judges (2022-10-26) →
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
