Brittany A. Rodriquez
San Antonio (SNA) · San Antonio, TX
Brittany A. Rodriquez is listed with San Antonio (SNA). The database records 1 asylum outcomes: 0 approved, 1 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Brittany A. Rodriquez was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in June 2026. Judge Rodriquez earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2015 from Texas Tech University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence in 2019 from the Texas Tech University School of Law. From August 2020 to May 2026, she served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Chaparral, New Mexico. Judge Rodriquez is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
Education: Judge Rodriquez earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2015 from Texas Tech University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence in 2019 from the Texas Tech University School of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Rodriquez is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
