Anna Diao
New York (NYB) · New York
Anna Diao is listed with New York (NYB). The database records 543 asylum outcomes: 130 approved, 413 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Anna K. Diao was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Diao earned a Bachelor of Science in 2002 from the State University of New York at Binghamton and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Fordham University School of Law. From 2007 to 2023, she served as an assistant district attorney for the Queens District Attorney's Office in New York, which included the following positions: chief of the elder fraud unit (2022- 2023); supervisor of the intake bureau (2019- 2022); and senior assistant district attorney in the economic and environmental crimes bureau (2014- 2019). Judge Diao is a member of the New York State Bar.
Education: Judge Diao earned a Bachelor of Science in 2002 from the State University of New York at Binghamton and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Fordham University School of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Diao is a member of the New York State Bar.
EOIR Announces 39 New Immigration Judges (2023-11-07) →
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
