Adam R. Morris
Phoenix (PHO) · Phoenix, AZ
Adam R. Morris is listed with Phoenix (PHO). The database records 3 asylum outcomes: 0 approved, 3 denied, and 0 other outcomes. Historical statistics are informational and cannot predict an individual case.
Yearly asylum decision trend
Asylum decisions by fiscal year and nationality
Each row shows fiscal year, nationality, valid decisions, and approval rate.
Judge background and appointment
Official biography
Adam R. Morris was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in June 2026. Judge Morris earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2013 from Wabash College and a Juris Doctorate in 2018 from Willamette University College of Law. From April 2022 to May 2026, he was an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Phoenix. From February 2021 to December 2021, he was a solo practitioner at Morris Immigration Law PLLC. From April 2019 to September 2020, he was an immigration services officer with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in San Jose, California. Judge Morris is a member of the Oregon State Bar.
Education: Judge Morris earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2013 from Wabash College and a Juris Doctorate in 2018 from Willamette University College of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Morris is a member of the Oregon State Bar.
This page shows only verifiable official appointment and biography records. No departure record does not confirm current service; personnel changes are labeled only with reliable sources.
How to read approval rates
Decision approval rateis approved ÷ (approved + denied). Blue “Other” is shown separately and includes identifiable withholding/CAT protection, cancellation or adjustment, voluntary departure, withdrawal, termination, dismissal, and administrative closure; it is excluded from the rate denominator.Approved share of all outcomesuses approved, denied, and other outcomes in the denominator.
With small samples, a few cases can move the percentage sharply. The page flags samples below 50 and below 200 decisions.
View methodology and sources →
Tang Ren Daily organizes public data only and provides no legal conclusion for any individual case.
