唐人日报
立足美國 · 服務華人U.S. Immigration Data
← 返回法官查詢
正在讀取 EOIR 法官資料…
TRRB · EOIR JUDGE PROFILE

Nina Froes

Chelmsford (CHE) · Chelmsford, MA

Nina Froes目前資料列於Chelmsford (CHE)。資料庫記錄377件庇護結果,其中批准150件、拒絕227件、其他0件。歷史資料不能預測個案結果。

裁決批准率39.8%批准 ÷(批准 + 拒絕)
全部結案中批准占比39.8%批准 ÷ 全部結案結果
庇護裁決377150 / 227 / 0
批准 / 拒絕150 / 227 / 0僅顯示資料庫記錄
年度變化

庇護裁決年度趨勢

申請人來源

按財年和國籍查看庇護裁決

每行明確顯示財政年度、國籍、有效裁決數和批准率。

官方任命資料

法官背景與任命資訊

任命時間May 2024
任命法院Lowell Immigration Court
任命類型Immigration Judge

官方履歷原文

Nina J. Froes was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Froes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Roger Williams University School of Law. From 2013 to 2024, she was a solo immigration law practitioner at the Law Office of Nina J. Froes in New Mattapoisett, Massachusetts. From 2012 to 2013, she was a clinical fellow at the Immigration Law Clinic, School of Law, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. From 2010 to 2011, she was the legal director of the Immigrant Victims Representation Project, Immigration Department, Catholic Social Services of Fall River, Catholic Charities USA, in Fall River, Massachusetts. From 2008 to 2011, she was a fellow in the immigration unit at the Legal Assistance Corporation of Central Massachusetts in Worcester, Massachusetts. Judge Froes is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the Rhode Island Bar.

Education: Judge Froes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Roger Williams University School of Law.

Bar admission: Judge Froes is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the Rhode Island Bar.

EOIR Announces 18 New Immigration Judges and 2 New Appellate Immigration Judges (2024-05-10) →

頁面只展示可核驗的官方任命與履歷。未發現離任記錄不等於確認仍在任;人事變動僅在有可靠來源時標註。

如何理解通過率

裁決批准率按批准 ÷(批准 + 拒絕)計算;藍色「其他」單獨展示,包括可識別的暫緩/CAT 保護、取消遞解或調整身分、自願離境、撤回、終止、駁回及行政結案,不進入批准率分母。全部結案中批准占比則把批准、拒絕和其他全部作為分母。

樣本量較小時,少量案件可能造成百分比大幅波動。頁面會提示不足 50 件及不足 200 件的裁決樣本。

查看資料口徑與來源說明 →

唐人日報僅整理公開資料,不提供針對具體案件的法律結論。