唐人日报
立足美國 · 服務華人U.S. Immigration Data
← 返回法官查詢
正在讀取 EOIR 法官資料…
TRRB · EOIR JUDGE PROFILE

Denise Hochul

Buffalo (BUF) · Buffalo, NY

Denise Hochul目前資料列於Buffalo (BUF)。資料庫記錄529件庇護結果,其中批准299件、拒絕230件、其他0件。歷史資料不能預測個案結果。

裁決批准率56.5%批准 ÷(批准 + 拒絕)
全部結案中批准占比56.5%批准 ÷ 全部結案結果
庇護裁決529299 / 230 / 0
批准 / 拒絕299 / 230 / 0僅顯示資料庫記錄
年度變化

庇護裁決年度趨勢

申請人來源

按財年和國籍查看庇護裁決

每行明確顯示財政年度、國籍、有效裁決數和批准率。

官方任命資料

法官背景與任命資訊

任命時間January 2016
任命法院Buffalo Immigration Court
任命類型Immigration Judge

官方履歷原文

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Hochul to begin hearing cases in January 2016. Judge Hochul received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1980 from the State University of New York at Buffalo and a Juris Doctor in 1985 from the Ohio Northern University, Claude W. Pettit College of Law. From 1996 through 2015, Judge Hochul served in the Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security, in Buffalo, in various capacities, including: senior attorney; assistant chief counsel; designated human rights law special interest attorney; designated national security special interest attorney; member of the Trial Advocacy Training Team; and as a special assistant U.S. attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of New York. From 1987 through 1996, she served as an assistant district attorney in the Erie County District Attorney's Office in Buffalo. Judge Hochul is a member of the New York Bar.

Education: Judge Hochul received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1980 from the State University of New York at Buffalo and a Juris Doctor in 1985 from the Ohio Northern University, Claude W.

Bar admission: Judge Hochul is a member of the New York Bar.

Executive Office for Immigration Review Swears in Nine Immigration Judges (2016-02-01) →

頁面只展示可核驗的官方任命與履歷。未發現離任記錄不等於確認仍在任;人事變動僅在有可靠來源時標註。

如何理解通過率

裁決批准率按批准 ÷(批准 + 拒絕)計算;藍色「其他」單獨展示,包括可識別的暫緩/CAT 保護、取消遞解或調整身分、自願離境、撤回、終止、駁回及行政結案,不進入批准率分母。全部結案中批准占比則把批准、拒絕和其他全部作為分母。

樣本量較小時,少量案件可能造成百分比大幅波動。頁面會提示不足 50 件及不足 200 件的裁決樣本。

查看資料口徑與來源說明 →

唐人日報僅整理公開資料,不提供針對具體案件的法律結論。