唐人日报
立足美国 · 服务华人U.S. Immigration Data
← 返回法官查询
正在读取 EOIR 法官数据…
TRRB · EOIR JUDGE PROFILE

Nina Froes

Chelmsford (CHE) · Chelmsford, MA

Nina Froes目前资料列于Chelmsford (CHE)。数据库记录377件庇护结果,其中批准150件、拒绝227件、其他0件。历史数据仅供信息参考,不能预测个案结果。

裁决批准率39.8%批准 ÷(批准 + 拒绝)
全部结案中批准占比39.8%批准 ÷ 全部结案结果
庇护裁决377150 / 227 / 0
批准 / 拒绝150 / 227 / 0仅显示数据库记录
年度变化

庇护裁决年度趋势

申请人来源

按财年和国籍查看庇护裁决

每行明确显示财政年度、国籍、有效裁决数和批准率。

官方任命资料

法官背景与任命信息

任命时间May 2024
任命法院Lowell Immigration Court
任命类型Immigration Judge

官方履历原文

Nina J. Froes was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Froes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Roger Williams University School of Law. From 2013 to 2024, she was a solo immigration law practitioner at the Law Office of Nina J. Froes in New Mattapoisett, Massachusetts. From 2012 to 2013, she was a clinical fellow at the Immigration Law Clinic, School of Law, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. From 2010 to 2011, she was the legal director of the Immigrant Victims Representation Project, Immigration Department, Catholic Social Services of Fall River, Catholic Charities USA, in Fall River, Massachusetts. From 2008 to 2011, she was a fellow in the immigration unit at the Legal Assistance Corporation of Central Massachusetts in Worcester, Massachusetts. Judge Froes is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the Rhode Island Bar.

Education: Judge Froes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Roger Williams University School of Law.

Bar admission: Judge Froes is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the Rhode Island Bar.

EOIR Announces 18 New Immigration Judges and 2 New Appellate Immigration Judges (2024-05-10) →

页面只展示可核验的官方任命与履历资料。未发现离任或被辞退记录,不等于确认仍在任;只有获得可靠来源时才会标注相关人事变动。

如何理解通过率

裁决批准率按批准 ÷(批准 + 拒绝)计算;蓝色“其他”单独展示,包括可识别的暂缓/CAT保护、取消递解或调整身份、自愿离境、撤回/终止/驳回及行政结案,不进入批准率分母。全部结案中批准占比则把批准、拒绝和其他全部作为分母。

样本量较小时,百分比可能因少量案件发生较大波动。页面会对不足 50 件和不足 200 件的裁决样本进行提示。

查看数据口径与来源说明 →

唐人日报仅整理公开数据,不提供针对具体案件的法律结论。