Jason Thomas
Detroit (DET) · Detroit, MI
Jason Thomas目前资料列于Detroit (DET)。数据库记录100件庇护结果,其中批准2件、拒绝98件、其他0件。历史数据仅供信息参考,不能预测个案结果。
庇护裁决年度趋势
按财年和国籍查看庇护裁决
每行明确显示财政年度、国籍、有效裁决数和批准率。
法官背景与任命信息
官方履历原文
Jason David Thomas was appointed as a temporary immigration judge to begin hearing cases in October 2025. Judge Thomas earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from Western New England University School of Law. From 2018 to 2025, he served as the veterans programs manager for the Executive Office of the Trial Court of Massachusetts. From 2002 to 2018, he served as a staff attorney in the Public Defender Division of the Massachusetts Committee for Public Counsel Services in Cambridge, Springfield, and Somerville. Since 2007, he has also served in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General's Corps, including in the following positions: military defense counsel, Fort Bragg, North Carolina (2016- 2018); special assistant U.S. attorney, Fort Stewart, Georgia (2015- 2016); medical evaluation board counsel, Fort Carson, Colorado (2014- 2015); chief of operational law, Fort Carson, Colorado (2013- 2014); and military defense counsel, Balad, Iraq, Fort Hood, Texas, and Fort McNair, Washington D.C. (2008- 2012). He currently holds the rank of lieutenant colonel. His military awards include the Bronze Star Medal and other campaign and service medals. Judge Thomas is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Education: Judge Thomas earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from Western New England University School of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Thomas is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
EOIR Announces 11 Immigration Judges and 25 Temporary Immigration Judges (2025-10-24) →
页面只展示可核验的官方任命与履历资料。未发现离任或被辞退记录,不等于确认仍在任;只有获得可靠来源时才会标注相关人事变动。
如何理解通过率
裁决批准率按批准 ÷(批准 + 拒绝)计算;蓝色“其他”单独展示,包括可识别的暂缓/CAT保护、取消递解或调整身份、自愿离境、撤回/终止/驳回及行政结案,不进入批准率分母。全部结案中批准占比则把批准、拒绝和其他全部作为分母。
样本量较小时,百分比可能因少量案件发生较大波动。页面会对不足 50 件和不足 200 件的裁决样本进行提示。
唐人日报仅整理公开数据,不提供针对具体案件的法律结论。
