唐人日报
立足美国 · 服务华人U.S. Immigration Data
← 返回法官查询
正在读取 EOIR 法官数据…
TRRB · EOIR JUDGE PROFILE

Craig A. Harlow

San Antonio (SNA) · San Antonio, TX

Craig A. Harlow目前资料列于San Antonio (SNA)。数据库记录400件庇护结果,其中批准145件、拒绝255件、其他0件。历史数据仅供信息参考,不能预测个案结果。

裁决批准率36.3%批准 ÷(批准 + 拒绝)
全部结案中批准占比36.3%批准 ÷ 全部结案结果
庇护裁决400145 / 255 / 0
批准 / 拒绝145 / 255 / 0仅显示数据库记录
年度变化

庇护裁决年度趋势

申请人来源

按财年和国籍查看庇护裁决

每行明确显示财政年度、国籍、有效裁决数和批准率。

官方任命资料

法官背景与任命信息

任命时间February 2013
任命法院Pearsall Immigration Court
任命类型Immigration Judge

官方履历原文

Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Harlow in February 2013. Judge Harlow received a bachelor of arts degree in 1989 from Lubbock Christian University in Lubbock, Texas, and a juris doctorate in 1992 from St. Mary's University School of Law in San Antonio. From June 2012 to February 2013, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security, in Dallas. From October 2010 to May 2012, Judge Harlow served as deputy chief counsel for ICE in Oakdale, La. From September 2007 to September 2010, he was the senior attorney for the New Orleans Office of Chief Counsel. From October 1992 to August 2007, Judge Harlow was an assistant chief counsel for ICE in Oakdale, entering on duty through the Attorney General' s Honors Program. From May 1991 to August 1991, he was a summer law intern in the Oakdale Immigration Court. Judge Harlow is a member of the State Bar of Texas.

Education: Judge Harlow received a bachelor of arts degree in 1989 from Lubbock Christian University in Lubbock, Texas, and a juris doctorate in 1992 from St.

Bar admission: Judge Harlow is a member of the State Bar of Texas.

The Executive Office For Immigration Review Swears In Two Immigration Judges (2013-03-04) →

页面只展示可核验的官方任命与履历资料。未发现离任或被辞退记录,不等于确认仍在任;只有获得可靠来源时才会标注相关人事变动。

如何理解通过率

裁决批准率按批准 ÷(批准 + 拒绝)计算;蓝色“其他”单独展示,包括可识别的暂缓/CAT保护、取消递解或调整身份、自愿离境、撤回/终止/驳回及行政结案,不进入批准率分母。全部结案中批准占比则把批准、拒绝和其他全部作为分母。

样本量较小时,百分比可能因少量案件发生较大波动。页面会对不足 50 件和不足 200 件的裁决样本进行提示。

查看数据口径与来源说明 →

唐人日报仅整理公开数据,不提供针对具体案件的法律结论。