Jennifer I. Peyton
Chicago (CHI) · Chicago, IL
Jennifer I. Peyton figura en Chicago (CHI). La base registra 173 resultados: 146 aprobados, 27 denegados y 0 otros. Las estadísticas históricas no predicen un caso individual.
Tendencia anual de decisiones
Decisiones por año fiscal y nacionalidad
Cada fila muestra año fiscal, nacionalidad, decisiones válidas y tasa de aprobación.
Antecedentes y nombramiento del juez
Biografía oficial
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Jennifer I. Peyton to begin hearing cases in September 2016. Judge Peyton earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1994 from Trinity College and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from the Case Western Reserve University School of Law. From April 2016 to September 2016, she was in private practice as a partner at Brown LLC. From 2003 to April 2016, she was in private practice as managing partner of Jennifer I. Peyton, Attorney at Law LLC, in Cleveland. In 2013, she joined the faculty of the Cleveland State University Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, where she served as an adjunct clinical professor, and in 2006 she joined the faculty of the Case Western University School of Law, where she served as an adjunct professor. Judge Peyton is a member of the Ohio State Bar.
Education: Judge Peyton earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1994 from Trinity College and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
Bar admission: Judge Peyton is a member of the Ohio State Bar.
Executive Office for Immigration Review Swears in 15 Immigration Judges (2016-09-26) →
La página solo muestra nombramientos y biografías oficiales verificables. La ausencia de una salida no confirma servicio actual; los cambios se indican con fuentes fiables.
Cómo interpretar las tasas
Tasa de aprobaciónes aprobadas ÷ (aprobadas + denegadas). “Otros” se muestra por separado e incluye protección CAT, cancelación o ajuste, salida voluntaria, retiro, terminación, desestimación y cierre administrativo; no entra en el denominador.Porcentaje aprobado de todos los resultadosusa aprobadas, denegadas y otros resultados en el denominador.
Con muestras pequeñas, pocos casos pueden mover mucho el porcentaje. La página advierte muestras inferiores a 50 y 200 decisiones.
Tang Ren Daily solo organiza datos públicos y no ofrece conclusiones legales sobre casos individuales.
